Why do two exact extinction chains of the same printer shop disagree?
research/selfrep-reconcile
Reconciles the two exact extinction chains of the lone printer shop (stylised, assumed inputs): the fleet-size chain is 1.5 to 7 times longer; adding the kit wait fixes small fleets but over-corrects large ones.
What it found
Two sibling chains of the lone replicating printer shop, one on fleet size and one on machines and vitamin kits, give different mean extinction times for the same inputs. Stylised, with assumed inputs, the fleet-size chain is longer by 1.5 to 7 times because its birth law min(n/W, a) lets machines and kits never wait for each other. A fixed-in-advance repair that adds the two waits matches the kit chain within 5% when the fleet stays at 1 to 3 machines, but falls 24 to 60% below it for larger fleets, where kits pool in stock. No law right in both regimes was derived.
A figure from its own output
Paper, code and results
More in Self-replicating manufacturing
- Which part substitutions cut a printer's vitamins most, within a performance budget?Which assumed part substitutions (printed bushings and nuts, wooden rods) cut the Prusa Mendel's vitamins most under a penalty budget: all seven take closure from 43/22/16% to 60/36/48% (lines/mass/cost); best set depends on the assumed penalties. Stylised.
- What does a wooden rod cost a printer in stiffness?Beam model of the Prusa Mendel's smooth rods: a wooden rod sags 20 times a steel one at 8 mm and needs about 17 mm to match it, and
selfrep-redesign's assumed dowel mass was twice the geometric one (stylised). - What natural-frequency target does a printer’s rod have to meet, and what does a wooden rod cost?Carriage natural frequency on the Prusa Mendel's smooth rods: a vibration target, not a sag limit, sets the rod diameter; hardwood needs about twice steel's diameter (stylised).
- Does an aluminium rod fit the printer where a wooden one cannot?Aluminium rods in the printer redesign: matching a steel rod's sag takes 10.4 mm aluminium (fits the assumed 12 mm holders) against 16.9 mm hardwood (does not), at 39.5% vs 37.8% mass closure (stylised).
- How stiff a rod does a frequency target need, in aluminium and in wood?Sizing printer rods to a first-mode frequency target instead of a sag spec: at 0.3 kg aluminium reaches 40 Hz with 10.0 mm (fits the assumed 12 mm holders) where hardwood needs 16.0 mm (stylised).
- How thick must a printer rod be to keep carriage ringing small at a given acceleration?Rod diameter from an acceleration and ringing budget: at 3 m/s² with abrupt steps steel needs 7.3 mm, aluminium 9.6 mm, hardwood 15.5 mm; a 20 ms force ramp cuts aluminium at 5 m/s² from 10.9 to 8.9 mm (stylised).
All 34 Self-replicating manufacturing projects →
Other research topics
Proper scoring & elicitation28Effort & peer prediction9Verification games & slashing19Detection & tolerances14Markets as routers13Prediction-market design9Paying contributors8Decentralised training systems23Digital twins & sim-to-real164LLM chip design loops40Robot manufacturing loops53Ambient AI assistant46Self-replicating manufacturing34Simulation-first design64Engineered clothing45Task-specific AI accelerators40Algorithmic chip-design loops42Open-source purpose-built robots44The software-engineering loop43Adversarial human imitation41Open-source residential construction41Autonomous multi-angle capture34Sensing, imaging and 3D31Energy supply and dense energy storage39Robot societies among people31Agentic co-design of low-cost robots27Laundry-hanging robots25Machine learning on qualitative data23Robots on the building site27Civilizations & group psychology1History & human sciences1
Produced with AI assistance (Claude). Results are from the code in this repository and are simulated or stylised unless the abstract says otherwise; nothing here implies affiliation with or endorsement by any lab, researcher or company cited. MIT licensed.