← All projectsGitHub
Robot societies among people

How many robots does it take to change a crowd's walking side when some people always walk on the robots' side?

research/society-blocs

How many robots does it take to change a crowd's walking side when some people always walk on the robots' side? Each 5% of always-robot-side people cuts the memory-9 mean-field tipping share (0.217) by about 0.04, 25% tip a crowd with no robots, opposing blocs raise the bar, and simulation agrees within 0.01. Stylised.

11 tests

What it found

The society-stubborn model with a share sl of people who always walk the robots' side and sr who always walk the status-quo side. For memory 9 the mean-field tipping robot share falls from 0.217 to 0.176, 0.131, 0.080 and 0.023 at sl = 0.05, 0.10, 0.15 and 0.20 (about 0.8 robots saved per ally), and a crowd with 25% allies tips with no robots. Opposing blocs raise the self-tipping share (0.219 to 0.300 as sr goes 0 to 0.3), equal blocs are a knife edge, and simulation (200 people, 12 seeds) agrees with mean field within 0.01 at seven bloc mixes. Opposing blocs alone cost 0.195 conflicts per human meeting. Stylised; simulated walkers only.

A figure from its own output

Figure produced by research/society-blocs: tipping_by_left_bloc
society-blocs/experiments/tipping_by_left_bloc.svg, written by the project's own experiment code.

Paper, code and results

More in Robot societies among people

All 31 Robot societies among people projects →

Other research topics

Proper scoring & elicitation28Effort & peer prediction9Verification games & slashing19Detection & tolerances14Markets as routers13Prediction-market design9Paying contributors8Decentralised training systems23Digital twins & sim-to-real164LLM chip design loops40Robot manufacturing loops53Ambient AI assistant46Self-replicating manufacturing34Simulation-first design64Engineered clothing45Task-specific AI accelerators40Algorithmic chip-design loops42Open-source purpose-built robots44The software-engineering loop43Adversarial human imitation41Open-source residential construction41Autonomous multi-angle capture34Sensing, imaging and 3D31Energy supply and dense energy storage39Robot societies among people31Agentic co-design of low-cost robots27Laundry-hanging robots25Machine learning on qualitative data23Robots on the building site27Civilizations & group psychology1History & human sciences1

Produced with AI assistance (Claude). Results are from the code in this repository and are simulated or stylised unless the abstract says otherwise; nothing here implies affiliation with or endorsement by any lab, researcher or company cited. MIT licensed.