Is risk tolerance the learning rate of a wealth market?
research/kelly-markets
Fractional-Kelly wealth markets as expert routers: risk-tolerance-weighted price, ln(1/s)/λ regret bound, growth-optimal λ*=(π−p)/(q−p), manipulation cost V·χ² vs LMSR b·KL (7.5× stiffer at p=0.99), and a switching-truth trade-off where λ≈0.1–0.2 beats full Kelly 3–7×.
What it found
When agents bet a fraction λ of wealth Kelly-style, the clearing price is the λ·wealth-weighted mean belief, total wealth is conserved, and λ=1 is exactly the Bayes mixture. Market log-loss exceeds expert i’s by at most ln(1/si)/λi on any sequence (loose on i.i.d. data), the growth-optimal fraction is (π−p)/(q−p), and moving the price against calibrated others costs Vχ²(p0‖p): equal to LMSR b·KL at b=2V for small shifts but 7.5× stiffer at p=0.99. On a truth that switches regimes, full Kelly is wrong about half of every segment (regret about 1630 at T=4000) while λ of 0.1–0.2 cuts it 3–7×. Binary events, static experts. Stylised.
A figure from its own output
Paper, code and results
More in Markets as routers
- How should a router pick k distinct experts?Top-k MoE routing as a capped Hedge market: price
min(1, λ w_i)with exact KL projection, regret vs the best fixed k-set held underk ln(N/k)/η+ηTk/2in every run (41–58% of it), plain normalisation prices experts above 1 (282/300 rounds, loss understated 3.2×), and systematic sampling gives exactly k distinct experts with 8–14× lower variance. - How should a router treat modules that are usually asleep?A self-financed wealth ledger for specialist modules that sleep: total wealth conserved exactly, sleeping wealth frozen (one private ledger per regime), regret
≤ ln(1/π_i)/η + η·n_iin the module's *own* awake time, entry of a module with wealthεcosts incumbentsln(1/(1−ε))/η; matches the regime oracle (0.1004 vs 0.1000) where forced-to-report Hedge sits at 0.30 and fixed share is worse. - Can a module game a ledger by choosing when to sleep?When may a module choose to sleep? The ledger pays exactly leave-one-out savings
ηW_A(1−p_i)S_i; sleeping *after* seeing losses gains wealthηp_Bθ(1−θ)/2(best 1/8) and takes the market in ~130 rounds with the router's loss unchanged; committed *before* serving it is a real saving; the deterring taxηp_B/2is a fixed share that halves honest specialists in 6 rounds. - What does it cost to route between models with conditional markets, and what does a stake do to the answer?Conditional markets that route between models: inverse-propensity Brier is proper even when the router reads the report, exploration costs exactly
1+(K−1)e^{ω²/2τ²}in payment variance (probit: infinite forτ ≤ ω), and a stake gap distorts the reported gap by a closed-form fixed point with second-order harm. - What share of the mass should a new module get?Admitting new modules to a Hedge/LMSR router: regret certificates obey a Kraft identity
Σ e^{−c_i}=1, so uniform entry1/(n+1)is the unique minimax rule; prior-optimal sharesP_j/S_jcostH(P); the price of entry is exactlyln(1/π)/ηindependent of the quality gap. - How much liquidity does a payment system need, and what do netting and gridlock resolution save?Does bilateral or multilateral netting, or gridlock resolution, save a payment system liquidity? A simulator fitted to Bech and Soramäki's Danish and Finnish bounds (34.7% and 10.1% of gross value against the published 37.2% and 10.7% for DK) shows reciprocal flows are what make netting work, and resolution cuts delay by 24–46% in the Danish-shaped system but 34–62% in the Finnish-shaped one, where the paper found about 10%.
All 13 Markets as routers projects →
Other research topics
Proper scoring & elicitation28Effort & peer prediction9Verification games & slashing19Detection & tolerances14Markets as routers13Prediction-market design9Paying contributors8Decentralised training systems23Digital twins & sim-to-real164LLM chip design loops40Robot manufacturing loops53Ambient AI assistant46Self-replicating manufacturing34Simulation-first design64Engineered clothing45Task-specific AI accelerators40Algorithmic chip-design loops42Open-source purpose-built robots44The software-engineering loop43Adversarial human imitation41Open-source residential construction41Autonomous multi-angle capture34Sensing, imaging and 3D31Energy supply and dense energy storage39Robot societies among people31Agentic co-design of low-cost robots27Laundry-hanging robots25Machine learning on qualitative data23Robots on the building site27Civilizations & group psychology1History & human sciences1
Produced with AI assistance (Claude). Results are from the code in this repository and are simulated or stylised unless the abstract says otherwise; nothing here implies affiliation with or endorsement by any lab, researcher or company cited. MIT licensed.