Does the rigid-diaphragm relief for a garage-front wall survive a nailed-wall stiffness model?
research/house-nailedwall
Does the rigid-diaphragm relief for a garage-front wall survive a nailed-wall stiffness model? Four-term pier deflection (bending, shear, nail slip, hold-down) in house-diaphragm's rigid split: yes; a centred 22 ft door falls from 1.05 (flexible) to 0.36–0.59 demand over capacity. Stylised.
What it found
Replaces the toy pier stiffness of house-diaphragm with a four-term deflection (chord bending, panel shear, nail slip, hold-down slip) and reruns the rigid roof-diaphragm split. The sign holds: a centred 22 ft garage door leaves the wall at 0.05–0.19 of its partner's stiffness, and its demand over capacity at 6 in nailing falls from 1.05 (flexible split) to 0.36, 0.48 and 0.59 at 100, 250 and 500 plf. Stylised: every constant is from memory and unchecked, stiffness is a secant at a fixed shear, and the flexible split still governs.
A figure from its own output
Paper, code and results
More in Open-source residential construction
- Does the half-and-half load split understate the demand on a garage-front wall?Does the half-and-half load split understate the demand on a garage-front wall? In a toy stiffness model a rigid roof diaphragm gives the garage line less than half, so the flexible split governs; stylised, torsion not modelled.
- What does an open, reproducible plan set for a 480 sq ft backyard cottage look like when it is generated from code?What does an open plan set for a 480 sq ft backyard cottage look like when generated from code? A 24 x 20 ft ADU composed from the track's models: drawings, bill of materials, IFC, lateral check, envelope energy (a tight envelope cuts modelled heating and cooling cost 36-37%) and a cost index. A worked example, not a buildable design; every input assumed.
- At what climate does each envelope upgrade start to pay, when climate is a continuous axis?At what climate does each envelope upgrade start to pay? Climate as a continuous axis over
house-energy's model: slab-edge R-10 from 3,271 heating degree-days with gas (2,386 with a heat pump), 3 ACH50 from 5,769, and cooling alone switches on only the attic and air sealing above ~3,000 cooling degree-days. Stylised: unsourced prices, no solar gain. - How much extra can a tight envelope cost before it stops paying back on a 480 sq ft backyard cottage?How much extra can a tight envelope cost before it stops paying back on a 480 sq ft backyard cottage? The ADU's whole upgrade package can carry $1,409 to $3,104 of extra first cost (3% real rate, heat pump); at assumed prices only the wall switch clearly pays. Stylised.
- Does a tighter envelope let a 480 sq ft backyard cottage use a smaller heat pump, and is the saving worth counting?Does a tighter envelope let a 480 sq ft backyard cottage use a smaller heat pump? The tight package cuts the design heating load about 36.5%, worth a $450 to $1,800 equipment step credit (assumed catalogue and prices) that nearly closes the payback gap of the costed upgrades in three colder climates. Stylised.
- When does cooling, not heating, set the heat pump size for a 480 sq ft backyard cottage?When does cooling, not heating, set the heat pump size for a 480 sq ft backyard cottage? Adding a summer load (conduction, window solar gain, internal gains) shows cooling governs only in Houston (12 kBtu/h baseline, 9 tight); sizes and credits elsewhere are unchanged, and Houston's credit swings between $0 and $900 with SHGC and latent allowance (stylised, assumed inputs).
All 41 Open-source residential construction projects →
Other research topics
Proper scoring & elicitation28Effort & peer prediction9Verification games & slashing19Detection & tolerances14Markets as routers13Prediction-market design9Paying contributors8Decentralised training systems23Digital twins & sim-to-real164LLM chip design loops40Robot manufacturing loops53Ambient AI assistant46Self-replicating manufacturing34Simulation-first design64Engineered clothing45Task-specific AI accelerators40Algorithmic chip-design loops42Open-source purpose-built robots44The software-engineering loop43Adversarial human imitation41Open-source residential construction41Autonomous multi-angle capture34Sensing, imaging and 3D31Energy supply and dense energy storage39Robot societies among people31Agentic co-design of low-cost robots27Laundry-hanging robots25Machine learning on qualitative data23Robots on the building site27Civilizations & group psychology1History & human sciences1
Produced with AI assistance (Claude). Results are from the code in this repository and are simulated or stylised unless the abstract says otherwise; nothing here implies affiliation with or endorsement by any lab, researcher or company cited. MIT licensed.