Does a deck post ever fail in compression? Numbers from the takeoff

A 16 x 12 ft deck at 50 psf puts about 2,300 lb on its busiest post. A 4x4 at 90 in is still at 27% of its column capacity. Where the limit really is.

Tools and projects · 1 min read · Source
wall-framing-takeoffdeckpostsstructural-check

The wall-framing takeoff's --deck mode now has an optional postCheck: you type the dead and live load (psf) and the post's design values fc and Emin (psi), and it reports the busiest post's load against its column capacity. It uses the NDS column-stability factor, pin-ended, and also checks the beam's bearing on the post top if you type fcPerp.

What the numbers say for the 16 x 12 ft sample deck (two-ply 2x10 beam, 12 in cantilever, three posts 84 in apart, 10 dead + 40 live psf). The design values below are illustrative typed figures (fc 975 psi, Emin 510,000 psi), not a grading-rule lookup:

PostHeight above gradePost lengthle/dBusiest postCapacityUsed
4x436 in18.5 in5.32,269 lb11,782 lb19%
4x460 in42.5 in12.12,269 lb10,941 lb21%
4x490 in72.5 in20.72,269 lb8,261 lb27%
6x690 in72.5 in13.22,269 lb26,478 lb9%

So on an ordinary residential deck, a post in pure compression is rarely the weak link. What rules the post out in practice is everything the check does not cover: lateral bracing and sway, the connection at the beam, uplift, notched posts and the footing's bearing. The tool says so in its output and does not size any of them.

Limits of this work: the arithmetic is hand-computed in deck.test.mjs; no real deck plan or permit set has been run through it. It is an estimate for planning, not engineering advice; your engineer and your local code decide the post.

Source: ventures/wall-framing-takeoff.

More in Tools and projects

All writing · All in this topic · All tools and research